Monday, April 6, 2026
Ruger LCP MAX: A subcompact pistol with 10+1 rounds of .380 ACP
The Beretta 20X Bobcat - an 8 round 22 LR subcompact pistol that's suppressor ready
Sunday, April 5, 2026
Self-hosted cloud servers (Windows, Linux, etc.)
https://www.geckoandfly.com/24024/self-hosted-cloud-storage/
"Self Hosting is the process of locally hosting and managing data yourself instead of renting a 'space' in someone else's computer."
"... you can always purchase a router with USB Storage capabilities. Just plug in your USB Flash Drive or external hard disk, from there on you can share files across your network wirelessly by connecting your USB storage drive, or other devices to the USB port on the back of your router."
- ownCloud Server: https://owncloud.com/
- Resilio Sync & Sync Pro (Personal): https://www.resilio.com/
- Syncthing: https://syncthing.net/
- Seafile Community Edition: https://www.seafile.com/en/home/ "Enterprise file sync and share platform"
- Cozy: https://cozy.io/en/ "Run your cloud at home via Raspberry Pi or Ubuntu." "... one instance per user. Not at all practical when hosting it for a family. "
- Redbooth: https://redbooth.com/ "enterprise file sync & share deployed on the customer's infrastructure"
- SparkleShare: https://www.sparkleshare.org/
- Nextcloud: https://nextcloud.com/ "a safe home for all your data" https://nextcloud.com/home-users/ "Self-hosted cloud collaboration platform for home users"
- Pydio: https://www.pydio.com/en/free-self-hosted-document-sharing-collaboration-small-business-pydio-cells "build your own box, on your own servers"
- Tonido: https://www.tonido.com/ "Share large files and folders with family, friends and colleagues"
- Dufs: https://github.com/sigoden/dufs - https://noted.lol/dufs/ - https://medevel.com/dufs/ Binaries: Docker, macOS, Linux, Windows. "Dufs is a distinctive utility file server that supports static serving, uploading, searching, accessing control, WebDAV & more." "It allows you to serve static files, download folders as zip files, simplify file and folder uploads, edit and search files, handle partial responses efficiently, control access, ensure secure communication with HTTPS, and integrate with WebDAV."
- FileBrowser Quantum: https://filebrowserquantum.com/en/ - https://github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser "Free self-hosted web-based file manager. ... FileBrowser Quantum provides an easy way to access and manage your files from the web. It has a modern responsive interface that has many advanced features to manage users, access, sharing, and file preview and editing."
- miniserve: https://github.com/svenstaro/miniserve "miniserve is a small, self-contained cross-platform CLI tool that allows you to just grab the binary and serve some file(s) via HTTP. Sometimes this is just a more practical and quick way than doing things properly."
Review: https://www.blog.brightcoding.dev/2025/09/16/serving-files-over-http-from-the-command-line-with-miniserve/
Friday, April 3, 2026
Comparing the Ford Maverick vs Ford Ranger pickup trucks
The Maverick seems like a clear winner (2026):
https://www.edmunds.com/car-comparisons/ford-maverick-vs-ford-ranger/
https://www.caranddriver.com/compare/ford-maverick-vs-ford-ranger (2026)
"These vehicles come from different segments. The Maverick is a compact pickup; the Ranger is a mid-size pickup.
The Ranger is larger (210.6 in long vs. 199.8 in) and heavier (4581 lb vs. 3913 lb).
The Ranger tows more—up to 7500 lb vs. 4000 lb for the Maverick—and hauls more payload (1788 lb vs. 1500 lb).
The Maverick offers a fuel-efficient hybrid power-train (191 hp, 37 mpg combined) alongside a 250-hp turbo four; the Ranger skips hybrids, offering a 270-hp turbo four or a 315-hp twin-turbo V-6.
In our testing, the Ranger V-6 hit 60 mph in 5.6 seconds; the Maverick Hybrid AWD reached 60 mph in 6.7 seconds.
The Maverick earned a 10/10 rating and spots on our 10Best and Editors' Choice lists; the Ranger earned a 9/10 rating and Editors' Choice."
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/advice/ford-maverick-vs-ford-ranger (2023)
"The Ford Maverick and Ford Ranger are compact pickup trucks with different appeal. The aging Ranger is more of a workhorse, giving way to the smaller, more affordable Maverick in some key areas."
"The Ranger remains a good choice ... particularly if you need more robust towing and hauling capability. The Ranger also offers more cab and bed configurations, and its body-on-frame layout makes it a better choice for off-roading."
"The 2023 Ford Ranger earns a predicted reliability score of 86 out of 100 from J.D. Power, barely edging out the Maverick's score of 85. A J.D. Power reliability score of 91-100 is considered the Best, 81-90 is Great ..."
https://realtruck.com/blog/ford-maverick-vs-ford-ranger/ (2025)
"Officially debuting as a 2022 model, the Maverick immediately captured attention for its affordability, impressive fuel economy—especially with its standard hybrid power-train—and innovative use of space."
"One of the most notable differences between both models is their size. While the Ranger is a true midsize truck, the Maverick falls into the compact category. It occupies a smaller footprint and possesses a smaller cab, bed, and less potent power-train. Whether you like the extra room to stretch or simply prefer a larger vehicle, the Maverick may seem a bit on the small side compared to the Ranger."
"Considering that the current Ranger generation and the Maverick have existed for nearly the same amount of time, neither necessarily has a leg-up regarding longevity. Reliability-wise, both employ Ford's EcoBoost turbocharged power-trains and share a chassis with other platforms in Ford's lineup. All this is to say that just because the model or generation is new doesn't mean the technology is untested. Ford's track record is overwhelmingly good, so neither should pose reliability concerns."
"The Maverick costs approximately five to eight thousand dollars less than the Ranger for similar configurations."
Thursday, April 2, 2026
PC & Electronic Tech - End-of-life (EOL)
Reloading - Gaining Ballistics Knowledge from Obsolete Cartridges
USB 3.0 vs. 3.1 - What's the Difference?
To differentiate this higher-speed connector from older USB ports and devices, cables were equipped with a specific SuperSpeed logo, and the ports themselves were often colored blue.
USB 3.1 arrived five years later and upped the ante again, raising the maximum transfer speed to 10Gbps using the SuperSpeed+ transfer mode."
"That goes for USB-C connectors too, although you'll typically find USB-C devices support the faster USB 3.1, or even 3.2 standards- not always though. Many USB-C cables marketed as charging cables only support USB 3.0 or even 2.0 speeds."
" ... these technologies might have been superseded by younger, more capable solutions, but there's still plenty of space for USB 3.0 and 3.1 to remain relevant. Many legacy devices that use USB-A 3.1 and 3.0 connectors for power and data transfer are still out in the wild, and most PC peripherals like mice, keyboards, and webcams, still use USB-A as their primary connector type. Considering desktop PCs continue to offer many USB-A ports to provide legacy support for these devices, too, it's likely that we'll see USB 3.0 and 3.1 around for many years to come."